Tag Archives: Corruption

Tackling Economic Crime Awards 2019: Call for Nominations

Entries are now open for the inaugural Tackling Economic Crime Awards (TECAs) organised by the World Excellence Awards team who also run the Outstanding Security Performance Awards (OSPAs).

The TECAs are independent and designed to acknowledge companies, initiatives, individuals and teams who have made an outstanding contribution to tackling economic crime, including any area of fraud, money laundering, bribery and corruption.

The awards are free to enter and open to anyone working in the UK and operating in the public, private or third sectors. 

TECALogo 

Commenting on the TECAs, founder Professor Martin Gill CSyP said: “These awards are different. Judges are nominated by fraud specialist associations and groups and all of the leading ones are involved. The Judges mark to an ethics policy and there’s an ethical sponsorship policy in place, too.”   

The entry process is open until 1 August 2019. Nominations are now invited in the following categories:

* Outstanding Manager or Director

* Outstanding Team

* Outstanding Customer Service Initiative

* Outstanding Training Initiative

* Outstanding New Product

* Outstanding Training Initiative

* Outstanding Partnership

* Outstanding Investigator

* Outstanding Policing Initiative

* Outstanding Young Professional

* Outstanding Cyber Company

* Outstanding Female Professional

* Outstanding Prevention Initiative

* Lifetime Achievement Award 

Winners of the TECAs will be announced at a prestigious Awards Ceremony to be held on Monday 9 December at the Sheraton Grand Hotel on London’s Park Lane.

*Information on the nomination criteria and how to enter can be accessed online at www.thetecas.com

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Risk Xtra

EY Survey: ‘Cyber crime tops list of fraud concerns for UK businesses’

UK businesses see cybercrime as a bigger threat than their international counterparts, with 74% of respondents to EY’s latest survey stating this area poses a high risk to their organisation compared to 49% globally

Businesses are also more concerned with the cyber threat from their own employees (36%) than from organised crime (26%)

Despite the UK performing better than the global average on serious fraud and corruption, 14% of UK businesses still reported a significant fraud in the last two years while 18% of executives consider bribery and corruption to be widespread

Despite the recent introduction of the UK Bribery Act, 46% of respondents in the UK agree it’s acceptable to offer entertainment to retain business compared to 29% internationally

EY’s 13th Global Fraud Survey has found cyber crime to be one of the biggest concerns for UK businesses. Specifically, 74% of respondents stated cyber crime to be a high risk to their organisation compared to 49% globally (second only to Brazil at 76%).

The survey included in-depth interviews with more than 2,700 executives across 59 countries (of which 50 respondents were from the UK), including chief financial officers, chief compliance officers, general counsel and heads of internal audit.

UK businesses view cyber crime as a bigger threat than their international counterparts, with 74% of respondents to EY’s latest survey stating this area poses a high risk to their organisation compared to 49% globally

UK businesses view cyber crime as a bigger threat than their international counterparts, with 74% of respondents to EY’s latest survey stating this area poses a high risk to their organisation compared to 49% globally

Globally, nearly 40% of all respondents believe that bribery and corruption are widespread in their country. However, in contrast this figure drops to 18% in the UK.

Despite the UK performing well on serious fraud and corruption, the survey does highlight that almost half (46%) of UK executives are willing to offer corporate entertainment in order to retain business. This is far higher than the global average of 29%.

John Smart, head of EY’s UK Fraud Investigation and Dispute Services (FIDS) practice, commented: “The rest of the world is playing ‘catch up’ with the UK in recognising cyber crime as a serious threat. High-profile cyber crime incidents and a number of Government initiatives may have played an important role in ensuring high awareness of this issue among business leaders here in the UK.”

Smart continued with a warning> “The conversation now needs to move on to how businesses respond to these dangers,” he urged. “Awareness is just the beginning. Business leaders need to ensure robust incident response strategies are in place. When a data breach does occur, many companies fail to investigate how and why an attack has taken place which can leave networks compromised and exposed as the full extent of the breach is never uncovered.”

The cyber threat from within

The research also found that businesses perceive employees to be a bigger concern (36%) than organised criminals (26%) when it comes to sources of cybercrime.

Paul Walker, head of Forensic Technology and Discovery Services at EY, explained: “The results may not necessarily indicate mistrust between employers and employees when it comes to cyber crime issues. The issue is whether employees take cyber crime as seriously as management do.”

Walker added: “Employees are sometimes seen as the weak link with individuals susceptive to phishing e-mails, where spoof e-mails are sent out in an attempt to gain passwords or confidential information, downloading viruses and transferring files to unauthorised personal devices.”

Encouraging picture on fraud compliance

The UK is performing significantly better than the rest of the world when it comes to getting the basics right around fraud and corruption. According to the survey, 94% of respondents agree that senior managers in the UK have strongly communicated a commitment to anti-bribery policies – roughly 10% more than the global average.

Despite the UK performing better than the global average when it comes to serious fraud and corruption, 14% of UK businesses still reported a significant fraud in the last two years

Despite the UK performing better than the global average when it comes to serious fraud and corruption, 14% of UK businesses still reported a significant fraud in the last two years

UK businesses are also top of the preparation table, with 88% having attended some form of bribery and corruption training. Furthermore, the UK is third globally when it comes to whistleblowing procedures, with 82% of respondents stating that their organisation has a whistleblowing hotline.

Despite these important processes being in place, 14% of UK businesses still reported a significant fraud in the last two years while 18% of executives consider bribery and corruption to be widespread. This may demonstrate that a culture of good compliance is failing to work its way down organisations.

Confusion over the Bribery Act

John Smart commented: “Overall, the UK continues to demonstrate a strong commitment to integrity and anti-bribery/anti-corruption compliance. This is supported by legislation such as the Bribery Act. UK companies take their responsibilities seriously in this area, and the results of our survey show a significant level of self-enforcement.”

In conclusion, Smart stated: “However, the fact that 46% of UK businesses said it was OK to offer entertainment to retain business shows there is still confusion regarding what is and is not acceptable. If gifts or entertainment are being offered as a quid pro quo or with a direct link to retaining business they are probably bribes. With the summer events season approaching, it’s more important than ever for companies to be extra vigilant around entertainment and satisfy themselves that what they offer is both appropriate and reasonable.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Financial Conduct Authority forges ahead of SFO with bribery prosecutions

The newly-formed Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has stolen a march on the UK’s lead bribery prosecutor the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in its prosecution of bribery and corruption, EY’s latest Bribery Digest has found.

The digest, which tracks bribery prosecutions in the UK, found that the Serious Fraud Office has not completed a case since July 2012.

In contrast, the FCA’s announcement of a £1.8 million fine in December against an insurance and brokering firm has seen the agency forge ahead with a focus on cracking down on bribery, despite being in existence in its current form for less than a year and juggling competing priorities.

Local police forces and Scotland’s Crown and Procurator Fiscal Service picked up the remaining three cases in this period.

Cost of bribery and corruption

The absence of cases from the UK’s lead prosecutor comes despite findings in a report last month that bribery and corruption costs the EU economy £99 billion on an annual basis, while 64% in the UK believe corruption is common.

The newly formed Financial Conduct Authority has stolen a march on the UK’s lead bribery prosecutor the Serious Fraud Office in its prosecution of bribery and corruption, EY’s latest Bribery Digest has found

The newly formed Financial Conduct Authority has stolen a march on the UK’s lead bribery prosecutor the Serious Fraud Office in its prosecution of bribery and corruption, EY’s latest Bribery Digest has found

The EU report also called for a bigger crackdown on UK firms bribing their way into contracts abroad.

Jonathan Middup, EY UK’s head of anti-bribery and corruption, said: “Not only is there a wealth of evidence that bribery and corruption around the world is continuing, but organisations are increasingly attuned to uncovering and reporting their suspicions. The pipeline of cases for the SFO is ever-growing.”

Middup continued: “However, the major prosecution in the past 18 months has come not under the Bribery Act, but the entirely unheralded Principle 3 of the FCA’s Principles for Business. It states that firms must take reasonable care to control their affairs with adequate risk management, in effect leaving FCA regulated firms far more exposed than other companies subject only to the Bribery Act.”

In conclusion, Middup commented: “In its first case, the FCA has made clear that any failures will be severely punished where a company has checks in place to manage risks, but does not use them effectively. This is a major wake up call to financial firms regulated by the FCA that tick box compliance will not be tolerated and that bribery and corruption is on their radar.”

Leave a comment

Filed under IFSECGlobal.com News